Skip to main content

Buy the Print Edition of Radical Second Things!

Pope Francis, Barack Obama And Buying In To Power

What makes a radical? What makes someone give up on moderation, stick to their principles and tell the world to get with it or fuck off?

I have been involved with Gonzo Times and the community around it since roughly 2010. It's been five years of arguing and brotherly bonds. I ran Gonzo Times for a brief time before giving it back to the founder, Punk Johnny Cash, earlier this year.

I think that the members of the Gonzo community have as many disagreements as agreements. I have disagreed with Josh over gun control - although he has made me come around to seeing disarming the police as a prerequisite that is necessary before private citizens are ever disarmed. I have disagreed with Luis about prescription drugs for behavioral disorders.

What is the unitary thing? I noticed, bizarrely, that almost every single member of the Gonzo community had, once upon a time, been a conservative or libertarian. I don't think there are actually exceptions to that.

Libertarianism and conservatism, while the former tries to be sexy and iconoclastic and the latter masked by religion and tribalism, pretty much sell the same thing - a defense of class establishments. People who attract to conservatism and libertarianism and leave that world are often pretty angry and feel a great deal of hate for America. Josh, Luis and I, despite our differences all share a disgust for the system and ideas we defended. Many, like Luis and me, thought we were actually being rebellious. When you go as far as I did, eventually interning at the Heritage Foundation, it's hard to be anything but radical. You've seen and heard the ugly and stupid nonsense that conservatism is really about.

I think this is important to think of when considering today's world leaders. President Barack Obama started out "a pretty radical guy" although he "clearly isn't that person anymore," as my editor Colin Jenkins said to me. What changed?

Whatever radicalism Obama may once have had, capitalism and the American power structure worked for him. He was able to succeed through Ivy League universities, raise millions of dollars through the most commercial election process on the planet and effectively become a trademarked icon. He tasted power and apparently liked it quite a bit. Some of his recent interviews seem to show that he has taken an approach in which the system is actually working despite the chaos we have been seeing in the news and in race relations.

Juxtapose this with Pope Francis, who apparently had an instrumental role in improving American relations with Cuba, a policy shift that may end up being one of the [few] lasting positive changes of the Obama era.

Francis is 78 years old. He has been in the Catholic Church for a very, very long time - long enough to have seen the horror of the far right up close and personal.  He has pulled no punches with his radicalism - going so far as to say the Vatican itself is sick with greed and lust for power, something that sounds quite plausible.

The right promises things the left doesn't and can't - wealth, superiority, prestige and power. Even if those things are false, it promises those things to its adherents while the Left demands sacrifice. People become most susceptible to their talk when they have not been exposed to it fully before. This may explain why many liberal politicians become susceptible to Washington D.C.'s national security community, buying in to the money that comes along with vouching for the military industrial complex even if, years before, they would have looked down on the campus ROTC.

Francis has seen enough to know what the Right really promises and to know both how critical the Left has been to Latin America and how to appeal to them. I have my doubts that the breakthrough with Cuba would have happened if he had not made the reported "personal appeals" that he did, although Obama has made progress on his own with Iran.


Popular posts from this blog

No More Rev

So I was working as a transcribor for Rev for the last four months. I stayed on despite a few very bad ratings. Over the last few weeks, my ratings were on point, regularly getting 5/5 and bringing home 3 figures each week.

I got great ratings this week and then abruptly, tonight, I got this message sent to me: 

Unfortunately, we can no longer keep your transcription specific account open. This is due to your accuracy and quality being below our acceptable average. Your transcription account is being deactivated today. If you have any other account type with us, that will remain open. This decision is final.
You will be compensated for all completed work. Here are your performance metrics for August 6 to October 5.
So, given that message, I would assume that it's time to school my self-esteem, right? I'm obviously not fit for this line of work. Well not quite. Look at the metrics they sent me:
MetricYouRevver TargetRevver+ TargetAccuracy4.34.24.6Formatting4.74.24.6% On-time submiss…

The Nix and the Science of a Great Novel

I recently finished The Nix, a novel by up and coming novelist Nathan Hill, which fits all the standards for a really great novel. Great novels, despite the fluidity of good literature, do tend to follow a formula - a formula that a great artist (and writing is an art) is able to adept to and mold in to his own creation.

A great novel is sweeping. Sweeping or sprawling. These are descriptions you often hear of great books. Benjamin Percy described The Nix as "culturally relevant, politically charged, historically sweeping, sad, full of yearning, sometimes dark, but mostly hilarious." This is something that could also be described with another great American novel, The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay by Michael Chabon, which one critic refered to as a novel with "epic sweep."

Chabon's book swept through roughly three decades - the three protagonists met in the 1930s and only resolved their problems and tensions in the 1950s. Nathan Hill's characters …

Evoke Part Nine: An Art Project By Jordan Denato and Orion Deschamps

RST on Facebook

About Radical Second Things

Michael Orion is a blogger, writer, artist and photographer based in the Bay Area. Besides his maintenance and promotion of Radical Second Things, he contributes to the San Francisco newspaper SF Western Edition, where he writes about local non-profit organizations.

Mark Cappetta is a practicing Catholic and active LGBT activist. He has been instrumental in keeping Radical Second Things and updates the Facebook account almost daily.

Eva Gnostiquette is an artist, programmer, "future scientist," bi-trans girl and graphic designer. She voluntarily helped to create the first print issue Radical Second Things and designed our beautiful banners. Thanks so much, Eva!

Jordan Denato is a professional artist based out of Iowa. He took the initiative to illustrate both Jennifer Reimer's story and Michael Orion's Oscar Romero work. He has his own art studio, Tar and Feather Studios, and is a critical part of Radical Second Things.

Radical Second Things is a liberation theology themed blog that has clear cut goals - we see the structural decline of the United States and much of the west and hope to present alternatives that will offer "a preferential option for the poor" as more become vulnerable.

© 2017 Radical Second Things