Skip to main content

Buy the Print Edition of Radical Second Things!

Rand Paul Is To The Left Of HIllary Clinton

It's very foolish to put faith in politicians. Nevertheless, Rand Paul has come out swinging as one of the best hopes for reform in our deeply confused country. Paul has stood out on the correct side of most issues since Barack Obama became president, from the government shutdown to a potential war with Syria. His gravitas really came home in a jarring editorial he wrote on the police assault on the people of Ferguson, Missouri, which my editor at Hampton Institute found impressive as he acknowledged the deadly mix of institutional racism and militarism that created this. There weren't really any bones picked or sparsed with Paul - that editorial said bluntly that "we must demilitarize the police."

If we go by the traditional defnitions of "right wing" - unwavering faith in traditional centers of power and authority, lack of intrusion in the affairs of the corporations and the marketplace and an aggressive national defense, Hillary Clinton is by leaps and bounds far to the right of either Rand Paul or Ron Paul. While Rand Paul was trying to court Jewish groups by saying American aid to the Palestinian authority should be lessened (something that makes sense as long as it is coupled with a reduction of aid to Israel) and denying that he read "anti-Semitic" books in college, Hillary Clinton was one of the few leaders on planet earth who defended Israel's 2014 assault on Gaza Strip. While Paul seems queasy talking about the issue, I think Hillary really believes it when she says those who are criticizing Israel for murdering children are "anti-Semites."

Hillary's credibility with the Left has to do with the baseness of identity politics (it'd be amazing if one were able to gain prestige in the political or business world just for saying "I'm a successful man!") while Rand Paul's lack of it has to do with the opposite. Hillary is a woman and has played to being a successful woman her entire career. Unlike the Paul family, her even being known in the political world has absolutely nothing to do with anything she has done but with her gender and who she got married to. Her record is actually quite horrid - she has supported every US military action since she became First Lady to now, from bombing the Balkans to an attack on Syria. While Paul certainly also earned privilege by way of his last name, that privilege and nepotism was not spent supporting the sort of imperialism that led to American police looking like stormtroopers. Hillary wasn't just in approval of the militarization of this country but in on it for two decades and in contrast, Paul's hands aren't clean just because he wasn't a political figure at the time - his father, who his iconoclastic politics were inherited from, was the staunchest voice against militarism in this country all the way back in to the Reagan years.

When it comes to the police assault on Ferguson, Rand Paul actually has credibility where Clinton never will. Since coming to the public light as a US senator, Paul has said that he sees the Iraq war and the continuation of the Afghan war as a mistake, opposed a war in Syria and has denounced the militarization of American police. Given the choice between him and Hillary, it is clear that Paul is actually quite to the left of Hillary Clinton. Quite, quite to the left.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Life is Much More Than Bratwurst:" A Chat With Rummelsnuff

A note - Blogging isn't free. Right now I provide gifts to my writers as a way of thanking people for writing. I would like to be able to afford to give them some sort of renumeration, even if it is small, for making this blog what it is. I'm in talks with a friend who may be able to help connect this blog, which has been in existence for one year now, with more religious communities dedicated to interfaith dialogue. Your donation will do a lot toward making that happen.




Rummelsnuff is awesome. If you don't know, he is Roger Baptist - a bodybuilding German singer who has toured abundantly in support of his music - an unusual composite of German industrial, drinking songs and electronica. Roger was nice enough to do an interview with me and took the time to answer in English, not his first language. Thanks so much, Roger!

First off, you have quite the physique? Can you tell us about your diet, your regimen, etc.?

Maybe I am lucky to like exactly the stuff, which is good for mu…

No More Rev

So I was working as a transcribor for Rev for the last four months. I stayed on despite a few very bad ratings. Over the last few weeks, my ratings were on point, regularly getting 5/5 and bringing home 3 figures each week.

I got great ratings this week and then abruptly, tonight, I got this message sent to me: 

Unfortunately, we can no longer keep your transcription specific account open. This is due to your accuracy and quality being below our acceptable average. Your transcription account is being deactivated today. If you have any other account type with us, that will remain open. This decision is final.
You will be compensated for all completed work. Here are your performance metrics for August 6 to October 5.
So, given that message, I would assume that it's time to school my self-esteem, right? I'm obviously not fit for this line of work. Well not quite. Look at the metrics they sent me:
MetricYouRevver TargetRevver+ TargetAccuracy4.34.24.6Formatting4.74.24.6% On-time submiss…

The Nix and the Science of a Great Novel

I recently finished The Nix, a novel by up and coming novelist Nathan Hill, which fits all the standards for a really great novel. Great novels, despite the fluidity of good literature, do tend to follow a formula - a formula that a great artist (and writing is an art) is able to adept to and mold in to his own creation.

A great novel is sweeping. Sweeping or sprawling. These are descriptions you often hear of great books. Benjamin Percy described The Nix as "culturally relevant, politically charged, historically sweeping, sad, full of yearning, sometimes dark, but mostly hilarious." This is something that could also be described with another great American novel, The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay by Michael Chabon, which one critic refered to as a novel with "epic sweep."

Chabon's book swept through roughly three decades - the three protagonists met in the 1930s and only resolved their problems and tensions in the 1950s. Nathan Hill's characters …

RST on Facebook

About Radical Second Things

Michael Orion is a blogger, writer, artist and photographer based in the Bay Area. Besides his maintenance and promotion of Radical Second Things, he contributes to the San Francisco newspaper SF Western Edition, where he writes about local non-profit organizations.

Mark Cappetta is a practicing Catholic and active LGBT activist. He has been instrumental in keeping Radical Second Things and updates the Facebook account almost daily.

Eva Gnostiquette is an artist, programmer, "future scientist," bi-trans girl and graphic designer. She voluntarily helped to create the first print issue Radical Second Things and designed our beautiful banners. Thanks so much, Eva!

Jordan Denato is a professional artist based out of Iowa. He took the initiative to illustrate both Jennifer Reimer's story and Michael Orion's Oscar Romero work. He has his own art studio, Tar and Feather Studios, and is a critical part of Radical Second Things.

Radical Second Things is a liberation theology themed blog that has clear cut goals - we see the structural decline of the United States and much of the west and hope to present alternatives that will offer "a preferential option for the poor" as more become vulnerable.

© 2017 Radical Second Things