Skip to main content

Buy the Print Edition of Radical Second Things!

Do Americans Want A More "Active" Foreign Policy?

American media has alot to do with American wars - they're the propaganda outlets and from Saddam Hussein to Bashir Assad to ISIS, they drum the fear in to people and lead us into various destructive conflicts. Rand Paul is a very serious threat to this establishment as, unlike Obama - who campaigned on expanding the war in Afghanistan, Rand has his dad's philosophy of foreign policy - don't entangle yourself and lead by example.

In D.C. world, that is "isolationism." Wars make alot of money - possibly faster than any other industry - and their merger with defense of fossil fuels for Western use makes for a horrible mess in which the United States is perpetually at war in the Middle East. The propaganda shows in polls;

Among Republicans who say they identify with the tea party, 54% now say the U.S. does too little to help solve world problems, and only 33% say the U.S. does too much.

That’s almost a mirror image of opinions among that group last year, when 54% said the U.S. was doing too much and 22% said too little.

That shift among conservative Republicans, if it persists, could pose a big challenge to Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), whose advocacy of less overseas involvement by the U.S. forms a central part of his potential presidential campaign.

Paul's foreign policy approach, which critics in the party have labeled isolationist, has appealed to many conservatives, but could now be out of sync with a major shift in public attitudes, the poll indicates.

Optimistically, 33% is still quite a bit among conservative Republicans to think US foreign policy is "doing too much." The thing is that the world has become more dangerous and I do not think Rand Paul would disagree with that. The reasons why it has become more dangerous isn't that the U.S. has "backed off." Obama is not a non-interventionist - he has intervened in nearly half a dozen countries since he became president. ISIS is powerful because they were given equipment and weapons in Syria by the United States and were so actively sponsored that they even got to meet John McCain.

Pollsters in the mainstream media are biased, though - they know the payoff in war so, if you agree that the world has become more dangerous, you support a more "active" American foreign policy. It's very simplistic for them - "active" means military force and not soft power. The U.S. is active when it brings aid to the Phillipines after an earthquake or helps distribute condoms in Africa - policies like that don't bring the sort of blowback that arming Islamic militants does.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No More Rev

So I was working as a transcribor for Rev for the last four months. I stayed on despite a few very bad ratings. Over the last few weeks, my ratings were on point, regularly getting 5/5 and bringing home 3 figures each week.

I got great ratings this week and then abruptly, tonight, I got this message sent to me: 

Unfortunately, we can no longer keep your transcription specific account open. This is due to your accuracy and quality being below our acceptable average. Your transcription account is being deactivated today. If you have any other account type with us, that will remain open. This decision is final.
You will be compensated for all completed work. Here are your performance metrics for August 6 to October 5.
So, given that message, I would assume that it's time to school my self-esteem, right? I'm obviously not fit for this line of work. Well not quite. Look at the metrics they sent me:
MetricYouRevver TargetRevver+ TargetAccuracy4.34.24.6Formatting4.74.24.6% On-time submiss…

The Nix and the Science of a Great Novel

I recently finished The Nix, a novel by up and coming novelist Nathan Hill, which fits all the standards for a really great novel. Great novels, despite the fluidity of good literature, do tend to follow a formula - a formula that a great artist (and writing is an art) is able to adept to and mold in to his own creation.

A great novel is sweeping. Sweeping or sprawling. These are descriptions you often hear of great books. Benjamin Percy described The Nix as "culturally relevant, politically charged, historically sweeping, sad, full of yearning, sometimes dark, but mostly hilarious." This is something that could also be described with another great American novel, The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay by Michael Chabon, which one critic refered to as a novel with "epic sweep."

Chabon's book swept through roughly three decades - the three protagonists met in the 1930s and only resolved their problems and tensions in the 1950s. Nathan Hill's characters …

Evoke Part Nine: An Art Project By Jordan Denato and Orion Deschamps

RST on Facebook

About Radical Second Things

Michael Orion is a blogger, writer, artist and photographer based in the Bay Area. Besides his maintenance and promotion of Radical Second Things, he contributes to the San Francisco newspaper SF Western Edition, where he writes about local non-profit organizations.

Mark Cappetta is a practicing Catholic and active LGBT activist. He has been instrumental in keeping Radical Second Things and updates the Facebook account almost daily.

Eva Gnostiquette is an artist, programmer, "future scientist," bi-trans girl and graphic designer. She voluntarily helped to create the first print issue Radical Second Things and designed our beautiful banners. Thanks so much, Eva!

Jordan Denato is a professional artist based out of Iowa. He took the initiative to illustrate both Jennifer Reimer's story and Michael Orion's Oscar Romero work. He has his own art studio, Tar and Feather Studios, and is a critical part of Radical Second Things.

Radical Second Things is a liberation theology themed blog that has clear cut goals - we see the structural decline of the United States and much of the west and hope to present alternatives that will offer "a preferential option for the poor" as more become vulnerable.

© 2017 Radical Second Things